Recent Comments
- Tweets that mention Working Dads: Hidden Heroes in the New Fatherhood Movement | Snapler -- Topsy.com on Working Dads: Hidden Heroes in the New Fatherhood Movement
- dyulyur on Doug Oldham DEAD: Gospel Singer Dies At 79
- Addison Jackson on WATCH: Shakira Teaches Schoolchildren in Soweto to Dance ‘Waka Waka’
- Luis Howard on Childhood Obesity is a Social Justice Issue, Too
- Aaron Bennett on The Prince of Persia was a White Dude?!!
- Emma Johnson on Jennifer Beals: What a Feeling!
- Olson on In Defense of Andrew Breitbart
- Diego Gray on Students Fight To Make Sure Their Teachers Aren’t Fired
- Olivia Smith on Donors speak out on Fair Elections
- lee ann on Unemployment Extension: The GOP’s Nearly Unprecedented Deficit Demands
Archives
- September 2010 (478)
- August 2010 (3821)
- July 2010 (3856)
- June 2010 (2536)
- May 2010 (3775)
- April 2010 (3494)
- March 2010 (3670)
- February 2010 (2905)
- January 2010 (2430)
- December 2009 (1161)
- November 2009 (194)
Tags
America barack obama bill business care Congress country day government health home house life money New News New York night Obama oil party percent Post president President Obama press reform Senate Show state story time today U.S. United States video Wall Street War Washington way week White work world Year
Tag Archives: washington post columnist
Militarization and the Authoritarian Right
Yes, former Bush administration speechwriter and current Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen’s demand that “WikiLeaks Must Be Stopped” is, as his colleague Eva Rodriguez notes, “more than a little whacky.” But it’s useful, too, because an infatuat… Continue reading
Posted in News, Original Content
Tagged authoritarian personality, basis, Bush, criminal enterprise, criminality, Examining, infatuation, militarization, military, news organization, personality, sentence, speechwriter, Stopped, washington post, washington post columnist, way, Wikileaks
Leave a comment
The Forgotten Battle Which Won The American Revolution
[Program Note: Our usual Friday Talking Points column is going on a one-week hiatus, so that we are able to present a special offering today, for the Independence Day weekend. So as not to cause withdrawal symptoms among our fan base, we offer up two ... Continue reading
Posted in News, Original Content
Tagged battle, columnist, day, discussion, emasculation, female president, forgotten battle, hiatus, john boehner, kathleen parker, pittsburgh newspaper, Revolution, revolution program, summer homework, today, washington post, washington post columnist, way, withdrawal, Won
Leave a comment
Holder Stands Firm Against DoJ Smears
Over at TAPPED, Adam Serwer has a brief item up on Attorney General Eric Holder standing firm against the smears leveled against several Department of Justice lawyers who have, in the past, provided legal representation to detainees suspected of terrorism. The questions on that matter were put to him by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who, in a parting shot, echoed the Washington Post‘s in-house Dick Cheney PR representative:
Grassley appeared to back down from his request but added one parting shot direct from the mouth of newly minted Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen: “I doubt that you would do the same with lawyers who represent the mafia, and I doubt you would allow them to represent the Justice Department,” Grassley said but didn’t press the matter further.
Posted in News, Original Content
Tagged Adam Serwer, Attorney General Eric Holder, chuck grassley, Department, Dick Cheney, eric holder, house dick, Iowa, item, Justice, justice lawyers, Marc Thiessen, matter, parting, parting shot, Post, pr representative, Senator Chuck Grassley, shot, standing, Tapped, Washington, washington post, washington post columnist
Leave a comment
Arianna Debates Partisanship On ABC’s ‘This Week’
During the roundtable discussion on ABC’s “This Week,” Arianna responded to retiring Sen. Evan Bayh’s (D-Ind.) claim that the major problem in Washington is too much partisanship. Such statements, she said, are made “with metronomic regularity … That is one of the most ludicrous complaints.”
Washington Post columnist George Will offered a “hear, hear.” Arianna continued:
Posted in News, Original Content
Tagged ABC, Arianna, claim, columnist, columnist george, D-Ind, discussion, Evan Bayh, George Will, Ind., partisanship, Post, problem, regularity, Sen. Evan Bayh, Washington, washington post, washington post columnist, week
Leave a comment
The Decade Ahead: From Radicalism to Restraint
Washington just turned the page on a decade filled with reckless spending, military adventurism and political fratricide. The costs of that era will be with us for some time.
Ten years ago, Charles Krauthammer took note of what seemed to be conventional wisdom at the turn of the century: that the United States dominated the world economically, culturally and militarily in a way that no other empire had done since imperial Rome. The Washington Post columnist was right, but not for long.
The ugliness of Impeachment in 1999 soon bled into the divisions of the 2000 election, the shock of 9/11, the “good war” in Afghanistan, the “bad war” in Iraq, rising deficits, record debts, a decaying industrial base, reckless Republican budgets, mindless consumer spending, massive trade deficits, a rising China, a falling dollar, the shame of Katrina, the enabling of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the empowering of Wall Street, the loosening of credit, the awarding of too many mortgages, the flow of too many dollars, credit default swaps, an economic death spiral, a reckless bailout bill, Bernie Madoff, the collapse of GM, Too Big to Fail, a Stimulus bill Washington forgot to read, reckless Democratic budgets, reckless health care bills, reckless Republican demagogues, imaginary death panels, the resurrection of Mediscare, skyrocketing unemployment rates, a surge in Afghanistan, record bonuses for CEOs, record poverty levels, and a country where elites in Washington and on Wall Street lived in a parallel universe from the rest of us.
Americans’ hubris at the end of the 20th Century gave way to an time of cynicism and doubt. In a few short years, our unipolar world became multipolar and America looked less like Julius Caesar’s Rome than an empire besieged by an assortment of invading barbarians.
So how do we rise to that challenge as we face a new decade?
At home and overseas, America’s recent recklessness must give way to an age of restraint.
THE END TO RECKLESSNESS OVERSEAS
The United States can no longer take it upon itself to make the world safe against every threat real or imagined.
While our citizens have spent the last quarter century fighting and dying in foreign wars, our global competitors have used that time to perfect a brand of economic nationalism that has laid waste to a way of life in American Rust Belt towns from Buffalo, New York to Detroit, Michigan.
Over the past decade, America has found itself bogged down by two occupations that drained our Republic of blood, treasure and credibility. And while we have been exhausting our resources in the pursuit of war, China has been making strategic gains across Asia, Africa and with our economic allies.
America can no longer afford to be the world’s policeman. Instead, we should only go to war as a last resort and then follow the strategy laid out by Colin Powell before the first Iraq War: “We will find the enemy, we will cut off the enemy, we will kill the enemy and we will come home.”
But we have never had a clear exit strategy in Afghanistan or Iraq. And without an exit strategy, wars become occupations and occupations become nation-draining adventures.
After nine years of such occupations, it is time to start bringing our troops home.
THE END TO RECKLESSNESS AT HOME
Washington also has to start showing restraint at home. As I noted in my 2004 book, Republican leaders on both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue put our economy at risk by refusing to make tough choices.
The Bush Era gave us record deficits and debts because its leaders decided they could have it all. History proved them to be wrong.
George W. Bush decided to increase spending at record rates at the same time he added a $7 trillion debt to Medicare, passed massive tax cuts and fought two wars on the other side of the globe. Choosing guns and butter–and trillions of dollars for a new entitlement program–put America’s future in the hands of foreign creditors.
President Bush inherited a $5.7 trillion debt and doubled it.
Barack Obama inherited a $11 trillion national debt and his budget plans will double that debt over the next decade.
By the time the 44th president leaves office, his own administration admits that US debt will equal 100% of America’s GDP.
Democratic shock at GOP fiscal recklessness before Nancy Pelosi became Speaker of the House in 2007 suddenly looks less than sincere. The truth is that no recent Congress–other than those brought in by the Republican Revolution of 1994–dared to make the kind of tough spending cuts that lead America toward a balanced budget.
We need those kind of leaders again.
THE END TO RECKLESSNESS IN OUR RHETORIC
Though Democrats and Republicans love blaming the other side exclusively for all the ills that plague Washington, when it comes dealing out the kind of savagery that has turned American politics into a blood sport, both sides share responsibility.
Ask a Republican why they refuse to give President Obama the benefit of any doubt and they will tell you it is because of how badly Democrats treated George W. Bush. But Democrats justified those attacks against Bush by pointing to the terrible treatment that Republicans like myself gave Bill Clinton in the 1990s. Many Republicans who attacked Clinton without pause pointed back to the liberal establishment’s harsh, personal attacks against Clarence Thomas, Robert Bork, Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon.
Unfortunately, there will always be party hacks and political extremists on both sides. But my belief is in this new decade, there will be a growing majority of Americans who will rise to the challenges that face us over the next decade and punish politicians who engage in nasty political campaigns.
There are new opportunities for alliances between progressives and conservatives outside of the Beltway.
Most Americans who are not in the ruling class have been offended by the Wall Street bailouts that the New York Times’ Andrew Ross Sorkin calls “the greatest redistribution of wealth in the history of the world.” Sadly, those trillions flowed from Main Street to Wall Street.
Both progressives and conservatives may also find common ground on issues like Afghanistan, where political commentators from Arianna Huffington and Pat Buchanan agree that it is past time to start bringing American troops home.
And though there will be tough policy debates on how we bring death-defying deficits under control, most grown ups know that Washington has to stop spending money that it does not have.
Maybe I’m a dreamer, but I really do believe that over the next decade Americans will find common ground and start getting this country moving again. Our divisions may be great, but what unites us is greater–a love for our country and the belief that our greatest days lie ahead.
Let’s get started. Continue reading
Posted in News, Original Content
Tagged Afghanistan, Africa, America, Asia, Bernie Madoff, Buffalo, Charles Krauthammer, China, Colin Powell, credit default swaps, death spiral, debt, decade, Detroit, fannie mae and freddie mac, George W. Bush, home, imperial rome, Iraq, Julius Caesar, Katrina, Michigan, Nancy, new decade, New York, Pennsylvania Avenue, poverty levels, President Bush, President Obama, recklessness, record, Rome, Rust Belt, spending, time, United States, US, Wall Street, War, war in afghanistan, Washington, washington post columnist, way, world
Leave a comment
Krugman: Deficit Hawks Trying To Scare People With Big, Out-Of-Context Numbers
On ABC’s This Week, host George Stephanopoulos asked Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist, about the argument that the nation’s rising debt level may lead to “a major weakening of American power.” Krugman responded:
KRUGMAN: You know, first thing to say is people are putting their money where their mouth is, which is the bond market. Things were fine. You know, the U.S. government is able to borrow long-term at 3.3 percent interest rate. So, obviously, you know, the market is not convinced.
Now, the market has been wrong. But, then if you do the arithmetic, these numbers look huge. The American economy is huge. The debt burden, even after five years, is going to be well below as a share of GDP well below levels that lots of industrial countries have reached in the past, including ourselves after World War II, when we were able to handle that just fine. [...]
We’re not going to hit 100 percent (of GDP in debt) until a decade from now. And countries have gone above 100 percent. I mean, if you actually ask about the interest cost, particularly inflation-adjusted interest cost, you know, we’re now paying 1.2 percent real interest rate on federal debt. Even if you add 50 percent of GDP in debt, which I don’t think is going to happen, that’s still only a fraction of a percent of GDP in additional debt service costs.
Washington Post columnist George Will, a vocal deficit hawk, pushed back: “But even unreasonably cheerful assumptions about economic growth and interest rates, we’re apt to be spending in 10 years $700 billion a year servicing our debt.”
WATCH (debt discussion begins at about 12:30):
On Monday, Krugman took to his blog to call Will’s response an example of “debt scare,” joking that the statistic about 700 billion dollars should have been “read in the voice of Dr. Evil.”
I get that a lot — people who talk about the big numbers which are supposed to imply that things are terrible, impossible, we’re doomed, etc.
The point, of course, is that everything about the United States is big. So you have to interpret numbers accordingly. As the graphic above shows — it’s taken from an article that managed to maintain a grim tone while reporting numbers that actually weren’t all that grim — what we’re talking about is a debt-service burden roughly comparable to that under the first President Bush. How many of the people now warning about the impossible burden of currently projected debt were issuing similar warnings back in 1992? Not many, I’d guess.
As Krugman notes, the cost of servicing debt levels are quite low today by historical standards, and even when interests rates rise, they are projected to grow to levels experienced during the 1980s and 90s.
Moreover, as Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim reported recently:
The focus on the deficit is also fraught with economic miscalculations. Long-term interest rates are extremely low, despite the hysteria, and the U.S. government is well positioned to meet its obligations indefinitely. The Chinese government, meanwhile, which holds a pile of U.S. debt, has little recourse other than to continue to buy U.S. bonds.
The Nation’s DC editor Chris Hayes put it succinctly, using an old saying, in a recent column: “‘When you owe $100,000, the bank owns you. When you owe $100 million, you own the bank’ — and it aptly describes the US relationship with China, which holds approximately 70 percent of its 2.3 trillion foreign reserves in dollars.”
Nevertheless, deficit hawks are threatening a dramatic move to force cost-cutting plans, as McClatchy reported on Monday.
A bipartisan group of more than a dozen senators is threatening to vote against an increase in the debt limit unless Congress passes a new deficit-fighting plan.
“I will not vote for raising the debt limit without a vehicle to handle this. … This is our moment,” California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein said.
She and nine other senators wrote to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., asking that Congress create a special commission to make recommendations that then could be decided by an up-or-down vote.
HuffPost’s Jason Linkins has much more on this plan for a deficit-fighting commission HERE. Continue reading
Posted in News, Original Content
Tagged burden, California, China, Chris Hayes, columnist, columnist george, cost, debt, debt service costs, deficit, deficit hawk, Dr. Evil, GDP, George Stephanopoulos, George Will, government, interest, Jason Linkins, Leader Harry Reid, market, Nev., new york times columnist, Paul Krugman, percent, President Bush, real interest rate, Ryan Grim, U.S., United States, US, washington post columnist, world war ii, york times columnist
Leave a comment
Battle Between David Broder And Harry Reid Heats Up: Broder Comments ‘Mind-Boggling’
David Broder simply doesn’t understand the way that today’s Senate operates, Jim Manley concluded on Wednesday. Manley, the senior communications adviser for Majority Leader Harry Reid, said that the longtime Washington Post columnist’s charge that Reid pales in comparison to former Senate leaders misunderstands the way the contemporary Senate works.
“It’s all fine and dandy to pine for the golden days of yesteryear, when politics was practiced differently, but that’s not the reality we’re dealing with,” Manley told HuffPost. “What David fails to understand is that Republican leadership in both the House and the Senate are being pulled along by the so-called birthers, the Tea Party movement and other far right fringe groups that are completely at odds with the views David claims to hold.”
Manley said that Broder’s failure to see the GOP for what it is today is common among Washington-based pundits.
“David might be one of the worst examples, but he highlights a myopic, inside-the-belt phenomenon that is at odds with the views of many Americans,” said Manley. There’s even a term for such thinking: Broderism.
The Broder-Reid spat broke into the open on Saturday night when Reid dismissed him as “a man who has been retired for many years and writes a column once in a while.” (Broder has taken a buy-out from the Post but continues to write two columns a week on a contract basis.) Reid was peeved at a column Broder had written accusing the Senate bill of not cutting costs adequately.
It may seem petty, but the Reid-Broder battle is a proxy fight between two competing approaches to politics. Reid, by attacking Broder, puts himself on the side of those attacking the Washington politico-media establishment.
“Maybe I have an idealized view of what a Senate leader ought to be,” Broder told Politico Wednesday for a story headlined: “David Broder: Harry Reid’s no Mike Mansfield.” “But I’ve seen the Senate when a leader could lift it to those heights…I wish it had that kind of leadership now.”
That’s not possible, said Manley, because Mansfield and Lyndon Johnson, revered Senate leaders, had a Republican Party willing to work across the aisle.
“LBJ had Robert Taft [R-Ohio], William Knowland [R-Calif.] and Everett Dirksen [R-Ill.]. Mike Mansfield had Dirksen and Hugh Scott [R-Pa.]. What David fails to acknowledge is that the current Repub leadership is betting on the president to fail,” said Manley.
“Why he can’t understand that is mind-boggling.”
“That’s an interesting argument and certainly there are differences between the people now and the people then and the environment that was there,” Broder told HuffPost. “But if that’s their effort to explain why Senator Reid has chosen the tactics that he’s chosen, that doesn’t strike me as an adequate explanation.”
Broder disputed Manley’s contention that the GOP blocks everything. “It is not a fact that the Republicans have refused everything. At least we don’t have much evidence of that so far. If he’s talking about a specific reaction to the pieces of the Obama agenda that have come up so far, then he’s in effect saying Obama is so frustrated that he’s about to abandon everything. I don’t suspect it’s the case. When the first measure relating to Afghanistan comes to the floor that generalization will collapse.”
Broder is probably right that the GOP will back Obama in his effort to expand the war in Afghanistan, but Manley was arguing more on the domestic policy front.
He references the fight to pass an unemployment insurance extension, which the GOP eventually supported but slowed down for several weeks.
“How David can make this kind of comment after UI bill is beyond me. It took more than four weeks to pass a bill in the senate that it took the House an hour to pass on the suspension calendar,” said Manley.
Broder acknowledged the unemployment point. “It’s a good argument as it implies to the unemployment extension. There have been many occasions where I have been very critical of the Republican stance.”
“It is a different Senate now and if I were writing on that topic — Mansfield, Baker, LBJ and so on — we might very well agree. But that was not the subject of that column and in my mind, that is not a particularly powerful or relevant rebuttal to the subject I was talking about, which is whether or not the potential savings everybody knows are needed are there in the bill Senator Reid brought to the Senate floor.”
Manley had specific gripes about Broder’s health care column, in which he cited deficit hawks to make the case that the Democratic Senate bill might not reduce costs.
Manley said that Broder’s column was discussed by “puzzled” Democrats in the Senate cloakroom. “No one could understand it,” said Manley. “We had the self-described gold standard of analysis – the CBO – highlighting that the bill reduces the deficit. And David utterly failed to acknowledge that was the case.”
Broder often refers to the Congressional Budget Office with the highest praise, but relied mostly in his column on “experts” who proclaim themselves “bipartisan” but whose goals are to dismantle Social Security, Medicare and other vestiges of the New Deal.
Broder’s argument was dismissed by his colleague at the Post, Ezra Klein. Broder, however, said he didn’t have to look far to find people who agreed with him – which is, in fact, one of the biggest problems the blogosphere has with his type of writing and thinking. “It was hardly a unique viewpoint,” Broder said accurately.
If Broder thinks that the GOP is genuinely willing to work with Democrats, the only centrist position between he and Reid might be in agreeing to disagree. “We have a Republic leadership betting on the president to fail,” said Manley. “David’s problem is he thinks this is all on the up and up.”
Continue reading
Posted in News, Original Content
Tagged Afghanistan, bill, Calif., case, column, David, david broder, david broder harry reid, Everett Dirksen, Everything, fringe groups, GOP, Harry Reid, Hugh Scott, Ill., Jim Manley, Leader Harry Reid, leadership, Lyndon Johnson, Mike Mansfield, Obama, Ohio, Pa., proxy fight, Reid, Reid-Broder, republican leadership, Robert Taft, Senate, senate bill, senate leader, senate leaders, Senator Reid, unemployment, Washington, washington post columnist, way, William Knowland
Leave a comment
David Broder Causes Confusion With Incomprehensible Health Care Column
David Broder is a Washington Post columnist who’s often credited with being the “Dean Of The Washington Press Corps,” which sound super fancy and important? Why then, is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — a man not known for his zingers — referring to his Excellency as “a man who has been retired for many years and writes a column once in a while?” Maybe because Reid’s had it with Broder’s walleyed Washington take and the way he never makes a lick of sense! In that regard, Broder’s got a tidy two-week nonsensical streak going, even by his own shockingly low standards!
Back on November 15, Broder decided that he had had “Enough Afghan debate.” He’s just so sick of hearing about generals and lawmakers, pondering options, trying to figure out a sound strategy, so that a bunch of human beings wearing uniforms, representing this nation, don’t get arbitrarily killed for no good reason! Nuts to that! And so what does Broder, who typically — and endlessly — calls for lawmakers to slowly and deliberately slog to the mushy middle of every single issue so as to maximize the yield of precious bipartisanship that Washington runs on, suggest? OH, HEY, MAKE A CRAZY, SNAP DECISION:
It is evident from the length of this deliberative process and from the flood of leaks that have emerged from Kabul and Washington that the perfect course of action does not exist. Given that reality, the urgent necessity is to make a decision — whether or not it is right.
“Whether or not it is right?” As Matt Yglesias said: “Surely this would have been a good opportunity for someone to say ‘David, you don’t really mean that do you?’” Far away, men and women will live and die by the decisions made, either carefully or foolishly, but those lives are so abstract to David Broder, who has cocktail parties to attend, where everyone will gossip about who’s up and who’s down politically, and the only casualties are electoral ones.
This week, Broder has taken a look at the state of the Senate health care plan. His column, which is damn near inscrutable, seems to say the following:
1. The CBO has determined that the Senate health care bill will reduce the deficit.
2. BUT! Some obscure poll says that a majority of Americans don’t believe that whatever health care bill we end up with will do what the CBO says it will!
3. There are people who David Broder knows whose stock in trade is concern trolling about deficits who say that the health care bill will not reduce the deficit.
4. OH NO!
Ezra Klein tosses a big, fat, “Huh?” grenade, in that direction:
I’m confused by the budget hawks who that take the line: “This bill needs to cut the deficit, and I don’t believe Democrats will cut the deficit, but since the actual provisions of the bill unambiguously cut the deficit, then I guess Congress won’t stick to it.”
People who want to cut the deficit should support this bill, and support its implementation. The alternative is no bill that cuts the deficit, and thus no hope of cutting the deficit.
What baffles me is the stock Broder places in this poll. Surely he realizes that just because a majority of people think something is going to happen, doesn’t mean that they are right? It could just be a measure of how badly misinformed the public is on the relevant facts of the discussion. It could also just be a measure of the public’s overall cynicism that lawmakers will really do the right thing when they are given a chance. But what could be causing this misinformation and instilling this cynicism? Maybe people like David Broder!
[Would you like to follow me on Twitter? Because why not? Also, please send tips to tv@huffingtonpost.com -- learn more about our media monitoring project here.]
Continue reading
Stan Van Gundy SLAMS Michael Wilbon: ‘Just A Talking Head’
Orlando Magic head coach Stan Van Gundy commented Wednesday on rumors about his job security, and lashed out at commentator Michael Wilbon in the process. Speculation mounted when the “Pardon the Interruption” co-host and Washington Post columnist said earlier this week that the Magic coach might lose his job if his team loses its playoff series to Boston. (The Magic currently trail, 3-1.)
“I’m not worried about my job security, and I’m even less worried about what Michael Wilbon would think about anything,” Van Gundy said. “He’s just a talking head. If you go on guys’ shows, they don’t criticize you. If you won’t go on their show, they do. That stuff is never known. There’s a lack of integrity in that business.”
More… Continue reading →